The prompt about open dialogues can rise true in online settings as it can be controversial for some. Individuals who can share the truth about media literacy and what is an appropriate form of communication may find that their beliefs can challenge others. One aspect I can relate this to is cultural practices that may seem inappropriate or unwelcome by other cultures. Having open discourse about what is appropriate and what is not while including factual information, may not be well received by others and are open to challenge. Additionally, it can be a source of conflict due to the idea of what can be considered valid information to share and who has access to it. Many countries, nations, and independent populations (communities that do not use media platforms) may challenge ideas of who should be allowed to access, evaluate and distribute certain types of information. While different messages, posts, and other media content can be open to the eye of the interpreter, some may believe that access to it should not exist to any extent. However, if we were to create our PLN around individuals and organizations that have similar values regarding media literacy, it would be easier to form opinions and make changes that benefit viewers to promote open and factual information. Though it may be difficult to see the information the same, having like-minded and supportive individuals whose primary goals are to provide meaningful, easy, and useful support to access information and media content the same, we would be able to cope with the ever-changing media tools and content that comes our way.